June 3, 2013
Over at American Legislatures, I have a new post about Governor Chris Cristie’s choices for a replacement nomination for US Senate in New Jersey. Three of the top choices from the state legislature–Tom Keane, Joe Kyrillos, and Jon Bramnick–are current state legislators who are near the center of their party in the state (with Bramnick slightly more to the left).
The punchline, though, is that New Jersey Republicans are amongst the most moderate in the country:
I estimate that they would probably vote like Maine Senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins once in Congress.
May 21, 2013
I just posted an updated visualization of state legislative polarization over at the Measuring American Legislatures blog.
Here’s a small version you can look at, but see the full post and explanation here. Look at California at the top with massive polarization, and Louisiana and Rhode Island at the bottom with relatively small amounts of partisan division.
May 8, 2013
Posted by bshor under Ideology
, Technical Comments Off
My coauthor (Nolan McCarty) and I are releasing a new version of our state and chamber-level aggregate data. We have focused on two major updates:
- In all, we have 140 chamber-years of new data. These now include party data for Nebraska thanks to friend and coauthor Seth Masket, who generously provided the informal but well-known partisan affiliations for Unicameral legislators.
- The individual level data underlying this release has been extensively cleaned to minimize the random noise inherent in acquiring roll call votes from printed journals.
You can find the data here.
January 3, 2013
Posted by bshor under Uncategorized Comments Off
The WordPress.com stats helper monkeys prepared a 2012 annual report for this blog.
Here’s an excerpt:
This blog got about 11,000 views in 2012.
Click here to see the complete report.
November 2, 2012
Posted by bshor under Uncategorized Comments Off
Sorry folks, had some showstopper bugs in my voter guide, despite my best efforts. I’ve taken the survey offline for now. Hopefully it’ll be back up soon.
November 1, 2012
I recently posted the graph of my estimates of the two parties’ congressional candidates. In that post, I wanted to emphasize that moderation still exists, even in this polarized age. To highlight that point and make the plots prettier, I smoothed out the distributions.
However, that smoothing hid another very interesting take-home point from the 2012 candidate scores. There appears to be evidence of bimodality (two peaks) not only across the parties—that’s good old polarization—but also within the parties. Here are the unsmoothed plots that make that clear:
No, those aren’t Halloween ghosts. It looks like both parties have two distinct wings, a moderate one and an extreme one. This visual inspection is backed up by test statistics from the Hartigan dip test for unimodality.
Feel free to download the estimates for all the 2012 congressional candidates here. The explanation of how I generated them is here.
We haven’t seen this before in roll call-based ideal point estimates, and I don’t think I’ve seen it before in previous years’ survey estimates (this is something I need to go back and check). So this could be something new under the political sun.
What could be causing this? Perhaps new electoral forces like the Tea Party on the right and Occupy Wall Street on the left are forcing candidates to pay lip service to dogma in some new way. And what happens after the election? Will this internal schism go away? Or does this presage a new battle between liberal liberals and liberal moderates, and between conservative conservatives and conservative moderates?
Your guess is as good as mine, though. Any ideas?
October 31, 2012
Here are two graphs representing the distribution of 2012 US House and Senate congressional candidate ideological positions. Higher (more rightward) scores are more conservative, lower (more leftward) scores are more liberal. Click on the plots for higher resolution versions:
A couple of things can be seen clearly from these two pictures:
- There are two distinct distributions of scores, representing the two political parties. They are distinct; or, in other words, the parties are ideologically polarized. Democrats are liberal, and Republicans are conservative.
- There is a significant amount of overlap between the party bell curves. That is, there are plenty of conservative Democrats who are more conservative than a number of liberal Republicans (and vice versa). Even in an age of polarization, the candidate pool is not completely divided, unlike Congress in recent years. This replicates a finding about the Congress of the mid 90s by Stephen Ansolabehere, Jim Snyder, and Charles Stewart from over a decade ago.
- On average, Senate candidates are slightly more centrist than House candidates. This makes sense given the larger, more heterogeneous states that they seek to represent, relative to the smaller and more extremist House districts.
- It appears the candidate pool of the parties in 2012 is roughly symmetrically polarized.
- These scores are based on candidate positions expressed in survey responses, campaign statements, web sites, etc., as compiled by Project Vote Smart.
- They represent 722 House candidates from 419 districts and 64 Senate candidates from 33 states with elections this year. Not all candidates were scored because of a lack of data, but it’s a small number in that position.
- I have jointly classified all candidates into a common space, which simply means that House and Senate scores are comparable.
- More details about how I generated these scores can be found in a companion post that I wrote to keep this one more lean.
- The underlying scores are preliminary and subject to change, but I’m making them available to anyone interested in the name of transparency in another companion post here.
- You can find out more about my research on legislative ideology here.